• About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result
STORE
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
NEWSLETTER
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
No Result
View All Result
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result

Biden Admin Proposes Immigration Restriction That Resembles a Trump-Era Policy

Tony Gray by Tony Gray
February 22, 2023
0
Biden Admin Proposes Immigration Restriction That Resembles a Trump-Era Policy

Amyyfory, CC BY-SA 4.0 Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International — CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

RELATED

Manchin Blasts Biden Admin Over New EV Tax Credit Regulations

Wendy’s Customer Hospitalized After Ordering Cheeseburger Sues Food Fast Chain

President Joe Biden canceled immigration policies enacted by Donald Trump upon his inauguration but announced revival of one Trump policy.

ADVERTISEMENTS
ON
OFF

The “new” rule was published Tuesday in the Federal Register to combat “a potential surge of migration at the southwest border.”

Advertisements

After a required public comment period, the rule is scheduled to be effective May 11 when the administration will declare the pandemic ended. Officially ending the pandemic will spell the end of Title 42, a Public Health Service Act regulation used to deport illegal aliens during a public health emergency, such as COVID-19.

The Daily Wire further reported:

The Biden administration proposed a new restriction on asylum seekers that closely resembles a policy from the Trump administration.

The new rule would prevent migrants who do not use already available legal pathways to asylum and do not seek asylum in a third country from applying for asylum in the U.S. Biden Administration officials said the rule was proposed in response to the end of Title 42 immigration restrictions. It also closely resembles a Trump administration policy which similarly banned asylum seekers who did not first seek asylum in another country.

“The proposed rule would encourage migrants to avail themselves of lawful, safe, and orderly pathways into the United States, or otherwise to seek asylum or other protection in countries through which they travel, thereby reducing reliance on human smuggling networks that exploit migrants for financial gain,” the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice wrote in a notice of proposed rulemaking Tuesday. “It would do so by introducing a rebuttable presumption of asylum ineligibility for certain noncitizens who neither avail themselves of a lawful, safe, and orderly pathway to the United States nor seek asylum or other protection in a country through which they travel.”

Advertisements

“In the absence of such a measure, which would be implemented on a temporary basis, the number of migrants expected to travel without authorization to the United States is expected to increase significantly, to a level that risks undermining the Departments’ continued ability to safely, effectively, and humanely enforce and administer U.S. immigration law, including the asylum system, in the face of exceptionally challenging circumstances,” the two departments continued.

The DOJ and DHS expressed optimism that the new restriction would lead to a reduction in migrants crossing the southern border; and thereby reducing the power of human smuggling networks and helping to decrease the numbers of migrants in already overcrowded border facilities. This reduction in numbers would ensure that migrant processing “is done in an effective, humane, and efficient manner,” the departments wrote.

After a public comment period, the new restrictions will go into effect on May 11th, the same day that the Biden administration intends to end the COVID-19 national and public health emergencies. Title 42 restrictions, which allow authorities to turn migrants away due to public health concerns, are also scheduled to end then.

The new restrictions closely resemble a similar asylum ban implemented by the Trump administration. Those restrictions, referred to as both “asylum bans” and “transit bans,” were highly controversial and bitterly fought over in the courts from the beginning of former President Trump’s term. The Trump-era bans were blocked by the courts in 2018 and 2020; the final rule was implemented on Trump’s last full day in office, but a judge struck that down as well.

Democrats and immigration advocates decried the new rules because of the similarities to Trump policies. But the Biden administration dismissed those criticisms, and noted that they have provided alternative pathways for migrants to seek asylum. In January, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas rejected the comparisons, saying that his plan was based on “a rebuttable presumption of ineligibility. And there’s a marked difference between the two,” he said, via The Hill.

Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.

TRENDING TODAY

Judge Sends Dominion’s $1.6 Billion Lawsuit Against Fox News to Trial
Media Watch

Judge Sends Dominion’s $1.6 Billion Lawsuit Against Fox News to Trial

by RTM Staff
March 31, 2023
Longtime Los Angeles Politician Found Guilty of Corruption to Get His Son a Scholarship, Teaching Job
Politics

Longtime Los Angeles Politician Found Guilty of Corruption to Get His Son a Scholarship, Teaching Job

by RTM Staff
March 31, 2023


© 2023 Resist the Mainstream

Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
No Result
View All Result
  • Newsletter
  • Store
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

© 2023 Resist the Mainstream