• About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result
STORE
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
NEWSLETTER
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
No Result
View All Result
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against ATF, Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban

RTM Staff by RTM Staff
January 7, 2023
0
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against ATF, Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban

Diplomatic Security Service, https://www.flickr.com/photos/statedeptdss/48788736523

RELATED

Tyre Nichols Death: Memphis Police ‘Permanently Deactivate’ SCORPION Unit

Minnesota Senate Passes ‘Most Extreme’ Abortion Bill in Nation — Measure Now Heads to Governor’s Desk

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday against a ban on bump stocks put in place during the Trump administration after the 2017 Las Vegas shooting.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans struck down the ban on Friday in a 13-3 decision, saying that the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) had overstepped its authority in the ban.

Advertisements

The ATF had banned bump stocks in 2018, at the behest of then-President Donald Trump, reinterpreting the terms “single function of the trigger” and “automatically” to make bump stocks illegal under existing federal law. The ATF’s new definitions effectively moved guns with bump stocks into the illegal machine gun category.

A bump stock is a device that can be used with a semi-automatic rifle to mimic an automatic weapon.

“A plain reading of the statutory language, paired with close consideration of the mechanics of a semi-automatic firearm, reveals that a bump stock is excluded from the technical definition of ‘machinegun’ set forth in the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act,” said Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod in the lead opinion.

Rich Samp, an attorney for the man who sued the government after he was forced to get rid of his bump stocks, said the case was not about gun control, but about who has the authority to set gun laws.

Advertisements

“This case is not about gun control. It is instead about who has the constitutional prerogative to change the criminal law if changes are warranted,” Samp stated. “The current statute, adopted in 1986, defines ‘machinegun’ in a manner that does not encompass non-mechanical bump stocks. It is unlawful for a prosecutorial entity like ATF to rewrite existing law without authorization from Congress. Any change in gun-control laws must emanate from Congress.”

The 5th Circuit’s decision could mean a potential Supreme Court showdown for the future of the regulation, which has not been struck down by other circuit courts.

The Gun Owners of America, a group that has also sued to overturn the ban, praised the decision of the court, saying the fight over bump stocks was crucial to defending the Second Amendment.

Read the full story here.

Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.

TRENDING TODAY

Arizona Supreme Court Responds to Kari Lake’s Second Election Petition
Politics

Arizona Supreme Court Responds to Kari Lake’s Second Election Petition

by Tony Gray
January 27, 2023
RNC’s Ronna McDaniel Declares ‘This is My Last Term as Chair’
Politics

RNC’s Ronna McDaniel Declares ‘This is My Last Term as Chair’

by RTM Staff
January 27, 2023


This is an excerpt from The Daily Wire.

© 2023 Resist the Mainstream

Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
No Result
View All Result
  • Newsletter
  • Store
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

© 2023 Resist the Mainstream