• About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • News Tip
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result
STORE
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
NEWSLETTER
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
No Result
View All Result
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result

Trump Slams US Judicial System After Judge Nixes Major Deportation Plan

Anthony Gonzalez by Anthony Gonzalez
May 4, 2025
in Politics
0

President Donald Trump condemned the judicial system early Saturday following a federal judge’s decision to prevent his administration from using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to deport Venezuelan gang members.

Trump took to Truth Social, expressing frustration over the ruling. “Can it be so that Judges aren’t allowing the USA to Deport Criminals, including Murderers, out of our Country and back to where they came from?” he questioned.

He continued, warning that America would face a future filled with crime if the decision stood. “This is not what our Founders had in mind!” Trump wrote.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. blocked the administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport members of the Tren de Aragua gang, a South American criminal organization.

Rodriguez ruled that the law could only be applied in cases involving organized, armed groups posing a threat to the U.S., a scenario he found did not apply to the Venezuelan gang members.

LATEST STORIES

‘Woke’ Actress Selma Blair Arrested for Allegedly Attacking 2 Delta Air Flight Attendants Midair

‘Woke’ Actress Selma Blair Arrested for Allegedly Attacking 2 Delta Air Flight Attendants Midair

October 13, 2026
‘Big Brother’ Star Amber Siyavus Dies at 46

‘Big Brother’ Star Amber Siyavus Dies at 46

October 13, 2026

The judge’s 36-page ruling explained that the AEA’s provisions, dating back to 1798, were intended to address foreign powers or military threats, not gang-related activity, as reported by the Daily Wire.

“The Proclamation makes no reference to and in no manner suggests that a threat exists of an organized, armed group of individuals entering the United States at the direction of Venezuela,” Rodriguez wrote.

This ruling marks a significant setback for the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

In March, Trump had invoked the Alien Enemies Act, using it as a basis for deporting gang members, including those associated with the Tren de Aragua, who had been sent to high-security prisons in El Salvador.

The deportations were based on evidence such as tattoos that officials argued indicated gang membership.

The decision represents a broader shift in the administration’s approach to immigration enforcement.

The use of the AEA was part of Trump’s ongoing effort to target transnational criminal organizations, which his administration considers a major threat to public safety.

The ruling comes amid ongoing legal battles over the treatment of Venezuelan nationals.

In addition to the AEA challenge, the administration is seeking to end deportation protections for over 600,000 Venezuelans covered under Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

This case, brought by Venezuelan nationals, argues that many individuals were wrongfully targeted for deportation, and their tattoos were not sufficient proof of gang affiliation.

In their defense, the plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that the evidence presented against their clients was insufficient and that many had been denied the chance to challenge the accusations.

The legal controversy highlights broader debates over immigration enforcement practices and protections for those seeking refuge in the U.S.

White House officials confirmed that the Justice Department would appeal Judge Rodriguez’s decision. At the same time, they are exploring other legal avenues to continue deporting individuals they identify as gang members.

This ruling highlights ongoing tensions between the executive branch’s hardline stance on immigration and the judicial system’s interpretation of constitutional protections and legal standards.

The administration maintains that aggressive immigration enforcement is crucial for safeguarding public safety and protecting American communities from criminal elements.

As the case moves through the appeals process, the broader implications of this ruling may influence future immigration policies and enforcement practices.

Continue Scrolling for the Comments

LATEST NEWS AND POLITICS

Pulling Back the Curtain on Glamorous Lawyer, Mom-of-Four, New WH Press Secretary Katie Zacharia
US

Pulling Back the Curtain on Glamorous Lawyer, Mom-of-Four, New WH Press Secretary Katie Zacharia

by Jordyn M.
October 14, 2026
Ilhan Omar Reports Net Worth Surge to $30M After Denying She Was a Millionaire
US

What Ilhan Omar is Now Being Investigated for Raises Even More Eyebrows

by Jordyn M.
October 14, 2026

© 2025 Resist the Mainstream

No Result
View All Result
  • Store
  • Newsletter
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • News Tip
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

© 2026 Resist the Mainstream