Lawyers for a group of South Carolina death row inmates who have run out of appeals argued to the state’s Supreme Court that two of the state’s forms of execution — the old electric chair method and the new firing squad method — are cruel and unusual punishments, although the state claims that “painless” deaths are not mandated.
The lawyers for the four inmates also argued that a 2023 law created to allow lethal injections to restart hides too many details about the new drug and protocol used to kill inmates.
This, as 33 inmates sit on South Carolina’s death row. There has not been a formal moratorium on the death penalty, but the state has not performed an execution in nearly 13 years after the drugs it used for lethal injection expired and companies refused to sell more to prison officials unless they could hide their identities from the public.
South Carolina purports that all three execution methods are consistent with existing protocols, saying “instantaneous or painless” executions are not mandated by law.
“Courts have never held the death has to be instantaneous or painless,” wrote Grayson Lambert, a lawyer for Republican Gov. Henry McMaster’s office.
During a hearing, the justices questioned whether the firing squad should be considered a banned unusual punishment since it has only been used in the U.S. three times in the past 50 years, all of which were carried out in Utah. They also questioned the electric conductivity of the human skull and asked if modern science has found the electric chair to be more painful and cruel than a century ago.
A lawyer for the inmates admitted that if the court bans electrocution and the firing squad, and if the state can show the drugs used for lethal injection are the right potency and purity and the method matches what is used by other states and the federal government, then they do not have a basis to stop an execution.
“I want to make sure it is humane as possible,” attorney John Blume said.
If the justices allow executions to restart and any additional appeals are unsuccessful, South Carolina’s death chamber could start receiving inmates again after going unused since May 2011.
While four inmates are suing, four others have also run out of appeals, but two of them face a competency hearing before they can be executed, according to the South Carolina non-profit Justice 360, which says it fights for fairness and transparency in death penalty and other major criminal cases.
South Carolina asked the Supreme Court to throw out a lower court ruling after a trial in 2022 found that the electric chair and the firing squad are cruel and unusual punishments.
Circuit Judge Jocelyn Newman sided with the inmates, whose experts testified prisoners would feel terrible pain whether their bodies were “cooking” by 2,000 volts of electricity in the chair or if their hearts were stopped by bullets from the firing squad, assuming the three shooters hit their target.
The state’s current execution law requires inmates to be sent to the electric chair unless they select an alternative method.
South Carolina used to carry out an average of three executions a year and had more than 60 inmates on death row when the last execution was carried out in 2011. However, successful appeals and deaths have lowered the number of people currently on death row to 33.
Read the full story here.
Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.