• About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result
STORE
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
NEWSLETTER
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
No Result
View All Result
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court Rejects Election Lawsuit That Targeted California’s Voting Process

RTM Staff by RTM Staff
June 15, 2021
0

RELATED

Chilling Details Emerge From Bus Crash Involving Country Music Star

Mitt Romney Tells George Santos ‘You Don’t Belong Here’ at State of Union Address

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a case that challenged California’s electoral process, specifically its “so-called winner-take-all system” approach.

The Supreme Court declined to hear the case and did not elaborate on its decision, leaving it without comment.

Advertisements

The lawsuit took issue with the way California selects its presidential electors. The plaintiffs, comedian Paul Rodriguez, former state Rep. Rocky Chavez, California League of United Latin American Citizens, and League of United Latin American Citizens, argued that the winner-take-all approach is unconstitutional.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs wrote that the method of choosing electors in the state, “by diluting and discarding votes … violates Petitioners’ right to cast an effective vote” and “severs the connection between voters and presidential candidates.”

It “results in the appointment of members of only one political party to the nation’s largest electoral college delegation,” they claimed. “(Winner-take-all) is not within the Constitution. It is instead a partisan invention by the states that has become the default for the nation.”

Worth noting: California has the largest population in the U.S. and currently has 55 electors, the most electoral votes in the country. Since 1992, the state has consistently gone blue in every presidential election.

Advertisements

Attorneys for California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), the defendant in the lawsuit, claimed “there is no cause for concern,” and that the state’s rules  do not “treat any voter or group of voters differently from any other or prevent anyone from casting a vote.”

“While a winner-take-all system of awarding presidential electors certainly ‘raises the stakes of victory,’ it does not interfere with petitioners’ ability to associate freely with the political party of their choice or otherwise deprive them of an ‘equal opportunity to win votes,’” the governor’s attorneys wrote.

The attorneys also highlighted that “petitioners are ‘self-identified Republican and third-party voters in California.'”

Not a first: The Supreme Court has thrown out several election-related lawsuits since December, including complaints related to the 2020 election.

Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.

TRENDING TODAY

Oregon Corrects False Information on Child COVID-19 Hospitalization Rates
COVID

Fauci Admits COVID Shots Didn’t Have a Chance of Controlling the Pandemic: ‘Scientific and Public Health Failure’

by Gary Ray
February 7, 2023
See It: Trump Comments on Picture Accusing DeSantis of ‘Grooming High School Girls With Alcohol as a Teacher’
US

See It: Trump Comments on Picture Accusing DeSantis of ‘Grooming High School Girls With Alcohol as a Teacher’

by RTM Staff
February 7, 2023


© 2023 Resist the Mainstream

Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
No Result
View All Result
  • Newsletter
  • Store
  • Politics
  • US
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • COVID
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
    • Cartoons
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Editorial Standards
  • Core Values
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

© 2023 Resist the Mainstream