On Friday, a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki about a recent meta study from Johns Hopkins, which suggested that lockdowns only appeared to reduce “COVID mortality by 0.2 percent in the U.S. and Europe.”
“Lockdowns during the first wave of COVID in the spring of 2020, found that it only reduced COVID mortality by 0.2 percent in the U.S. and Europe, and suggested that they have little to no public health benefit, but severe consequences for the economy — and it suggests that lockdowns shouldn’t be a part of a future pandemic response,” the reporter said before following up with a question: “Is that the shared view of the administration looking in the rearview mirror?”
Psaki responded, first refusing to comment on the “specifics” of this study — pointing to “our health and medical experts” for that. She then stated that the president isn’t “pushing lockdowns.”
“…we’ve not been pro-lockdown. That has not been his agenda,” Psaki said. “Most of the lockdowns actually happened under the previous president.”
The press secretary continued, issuing talking points regarding the number of Americans vaccinated and the percentage of schools open.
The reporter followed up, asking: “So, you guys do believe then that the lockdowns were more harmful than helpful?”
Psaki dodged, pointing once again to “our scientific experts,” and claiming that the president doesn’t favor lockdowns.
But the president’s agenda, the president’s approach has not been lockdowns. It has been using the tools we have to prevent that.
This is an excerpt from The Daily Wire.
Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.