While appearing on a recent episode of “Timcast” with Tim Pool and Michael Malice, Roseanne Barr gave several dark predictions for the 2024 election, suggesting that there may not be an election at all.
The moment began when Malice and Pool were discussing the 2024 election and Barr began to speak, saying, “I don’t even think we’re gonna have an election, Tim. I don’t think we’re gonna have no election in 2024.”
Barr and Malice began discussing the possibility, and Malice was willing to make a bet with her for $1,000 that an election would happen.
Pool, however, wasn’t willing to close out the discussion and asked Barr, “Why do you think there won’t be an election?”
“Because I think the corruption is just beginning to come out, and I think it’s going to avalanche, the corruption of the Biden administration and the money they took,” she replied. “First it’s gonna be about Ukraine and Russia, then it’s gonna go into China, then it’s gonna go into the DOJ and it’s gonna be like a big old avalanche.”
“That would prompt an election,” Pool suggested, to which Barr replied, “Nope, because I think it’s gonna get so bad in the streets too that I think the military is gonna step in.”
Pool then turned to Malice, saying, “Michael we’ve talked about how many people that come on the show and said this is like the one time they actually are not convinced there’ll be an election.”
Pool was continuing to speak when Malice interrupted, saying “We hear that every four years,” a general disagreement from Barr and Pool. However, Malice contended, “I remember very vividly on Newsmax.com in 2000 they argued that Clinton isn’t gonna leave the White House.”
Pool replied, “and they argued that in 2016 … but that’s not every single time, this is the Trump, the culture war period. I’m saying, we’ve had people on the show where we’ve discussed … what is the potentiality, what is the percentage rate of there not being an election, and it’s not zero.”
Watch:
Roseanne-Barr-Blows-Tim-Pool-s-Mind-with-Her-Dark-2024-Election-Prediction-DM-CLIPS-Rubin-Report-online-video-cutter-com
“It’s not zero, that’s fair,” Malice conceded, but argued, “we had an election during the Civil War, we had an election during WWII. The best predictor for future behavior is history, so if there was precedent for canceling elections, I’d be more receptive to this argument.”
“And here’s the thing, they don’t need to cancel it, that’s the point,” Malice continued. “When Trudeau just got reelected with the exact same number of seats as previously, he said, ‘ope, I have a mandate.’ so they will absolutely have the election and whatever happens they’ll say ‘I have a mandate to do whatever the f I want.’”
“What if more information comes out that proves things that certain people don’t think are ever going to be proven?” Barr asked before Pool asked a follow up question.
“We need to clarify this bet. What do you mean by election?”
Barr paused for a minute before responding, “I mean a presidential election,” to which Malice agreed, “Yeah, people go in and vote.”
Pool brought up a historical example “In 1876, the people went in to vote, and then the president was determined by a committee.”
Pool explained that the election was, effectively, decided by committee, and that only certain votes were counted. Malice argued that this was a historical myth, but acknowledged that his source could have been wrong.
Fellow host Ian Crossland chimed in, saying, “Well, with modern day elections, I’m concerned that there’s gonna be a dog and pony show and they’re like: ‘hey everybody voted, but we’re just gonna go in the back room and count it and then tell you what the answer is’ and you’re like, dude, show me the votes.”
“That’s the thing, for them to actually have military law, it’s really hard to put that over brazenly,” Malice argued.
“But we might already be under military law and a lot of people don’t know that we are,” Barr replied, to which another member on the podcast pointed out that your “average SWAT team” looks “just like special forces.”
Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.
