Candace Owens publicly suggested that Jewish people or the state of Israel were involved in the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Owens claimed without providing evidence to support it.
She framed her statement as a possible explanation for Kirk’s death, which occurred during a campus event at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025.
Owens’ comments were made in the context of ongoing public discussion following Kirk’s death. She indicated that responsibility for the shooting could involve either Jewish individuals or Israel as a nation.
The Los Angeles Times reported her claim but noted that she did not cite any factual basis or investigative findings to substantiate the allegation.
The reporting highlights that Owens’ statement has been widely discussed in media coverage because it identifies a religious and national group in connection with a violent act. The Los Angeles Times described her claim as speculative and unverified.
Owens’ comments were made publicly on social media and in interviews, and she presented them as her interpretation of potential motives or actors behind the killing.
The article also contextualized Owens’ remarks within broader political discourse. Owens is a conservative commentator who has previously made public statements on controversial topics.
The Los Angeles Times characterized her claim regarding Kirk’s death as part of ongoing commentary that intersects with political and cultural issues. The report did not present any independent evidence to corroborate Owens’ assertion.
Owens’ suggestion directly links Kirk’s death to a specific religious community and a nation-state.
The Los Angeles Times noted that her claim has generated reactions in the media and public discussion, given the identification of Jewish people or Israel as potentially responsible. The reporting emphasizes that Owens did not provide sources, documentation, or investigative findings to support the statement.
The article presented her comments as an example of post-event speculation. It reported that Owens’ statement has been circulated on social media and cited by some outlets, while also noting that mainstream reporting on Kirk’s assassination has not confirmed any involvement of Jewish individuals or Israel.
The Los Angeles Times placed her remarks in context, highlighting that they remain claims made by Owens without verification.
In summary, Candace Owens suggested that Jewish people or Israel may have been involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
The Los Angeles Times reported the claim, noting that it is unsubstantiated and speculative. Owens’ statements were made publicly and have been part of media coverage in the aftermath of Kirk’s death, but the article did not present any evidence confirming her assertions.
Her comments are framed in the report as an interpretation or hypothesis offered by Owens, rather than as verified information.
The Los Angeles Times coverage focuses on Owens’ claim, providing an account of what she said while clarifying that no evidence has emerged to substantiate the allegation.
It should be noted, however, that just a day before his death, Kirk questioned the integrity of the Israeli government during an interview with Jewish Daily Wire host Ben Shapiro.
Specifically, Kirk fired back against claims made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who argued that “you can’t be MAGA if you’re anti-Israel.”
